Diplacus brandegeei (Pennell) G.L.Nesom (2012:1)
Santa Cruz Island monkeyflower
Taxonomy & Nomenclature
Synonyms: Mimulus brandegei Pennell in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 99: 170 (1947) (protonym but not basionym; used by Pennell, 1947; Smith & York, 1984:3) Mimulus brandegeei Pennell in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 99: 170 (1947) (basionym); Mimulus latifolius A.Gray in Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts 11: 95 (1876); Eunanus latifolius (A.Gray) Greene in Bull. Calif. Acad. Sci. 1(3): 99 (1885); Diplacus latifolius (A.Gray) G.L.Nesom in Phytoneuron 2012-39: 32 (2012), nom. illeg.
Mimulus brandegeei has been considered a synonym of M. latifolius by (Hickman, 1993; Baldwin et al., 2012; Rejmánek, 2018; Humphreys et al., 2019), however the warranted transfer of M. latifolius to Diplacus (Barker et al., 2012) accidentally resulted in the junior homonym D. latifolius (A. Gray) Nesom (2012) non D. latifolius Nutt. 1838. This was remedied by Nesom (2012) who elected to formally transfer the heterotypic synonym M. brandegeei to Diplacus as it was an available name.
Conservation Status
Extinct (Smith & York, 1984:3)
Last record: 1932 (Ripley, 1975:46; Smith & York, 1984:3)
Distribution
Santa Cruz Island, California, USA
Biology & Ecology
Hypodigm
Media
References
Baldwin, B. G., Goldman, D. H., Keil, D. J., Paterson, R., Rosatti, T. J., and Wilken, D. H. (2012). The Jepson Manual: Vascular plants of California, 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Barker, W. R., Nesom, G. L., Beardsley, P. M. and Fraga, N. S. (2012). A taxonomic conspectus of Phrymaceae: A narrowed circumscription for Mimulus, new and resurrected genera, and new names and combinations. Phytoneuron 39: 1-60.
CPC. (1990). Centre for plant conservation data for North American plants database. CPC, Centre for plant conservation.
Flora of North America Editorial Committee (2019). Flora of North America North of Mexico 17: 1-737. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.
Govaerts, R. (2001). World Checklist of Seed Plants Database in ACCESS E-F: 1-50919.
Hickman, J. C. (Ed.) (1993). The Jepson Manual: Higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Humphreys, Aelys M., Govaerts, Rafaël, Ficinski, Sarah Z., Lughadha, Eimear Nic and Vorontsova, Maria S. (2019). Global dataset shows geography and life form predict modern plant extinction and rediscovery. Nature Ecology & Evolution 3: 1043-1047. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0906-2 [Supplementary Dataset 1]
Moran, R. (1996). The flora of Guadalupe island, Mexico. Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences 19: 1-190.
Nesom, G. L. (2012). Diplacus brandeegei (Pennell) Nesom (Phrymaceae) is the correct name for the insular endemic, not Diplacus latifolius (A. Gray) Nesom. Phytoneuron 54: 1.
Philbrick, Ralph N. (1980). Distribution and Evolution of Endemic Plants of the California Islands, pp. 173-187. In: Power, D. M. (ed.). California Islands proceedings. A multidisciplinary symposium. Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. ["must be assumed to be extinct" (p. 184)]
POWO. 2018. Plants of the World online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://e-monocot.org/.
POWO. (2024). Diplacus brandegeei (Pennell) G.L.Nesom. Plants of the World Online (online resource). Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, United Kingdom. Available at: https://powo.science.kew.org/ [Accessed 4 April 2024]
Rejmánek, Marcel. (2018). Vascular plant extinctions in California: A critical assessment. Diversity and Distributions 24(1): 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12665
Ripley, S. Dillon. (1975). Report on endangered and threatened species of the United States. House Document 94-51: 1-200 [46].
Smith, James Payne, Jnr. (ed.) and York, Richard (DEM). (1984). Inventory of rare and endangered vascular plants of California. Special Publication No. 1 (3rd edition). Berkeley, California: California Native Plant Society. xviii + 174 pp.
Walter, Kerry S. and Gillett, Harriet J. (eds.). (1998). 1997 IUCN Red List of Threatened Plants. Compiled by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK: IUCN – The World Conservation Union. lxiv + 862 pp.